Type: Romano-British palace, Claudian supply-base.
Model of Fishbourne Palace c.AD75
Shows its original situation beside a deepwater harbour. The palace now lies several hundred yards from the modern Chichester Channel.
E (1¼) to NOVIOMAGVS REGNORVM (Chichester, West Sussex)|
WNW (28) to CLAVSENTVM (Bitterne, Hampshire)
The first buildings on the Fishbourne site were timber-built and of a military nature, very likely a deepwater anchorage and supply-base built during the initial Claudian invasion of south-east Britain. The campaigns on the south coast were conducted by the future emperor Vespasian, at this time known merely as the legate Titus Flavius Vespasianus, who was placed in command of the Second Augustan Legion. These timber buildings were possibly built as early as the winter of AD43/44, during the early governorship of the propraetor Aulus Plautius.
The Roman villa at Fishbourne was discovered and excavated in the early 1960's. The dig revealed a palatial residence with ornate gardens, a large bath suite, many mozaic floors and tesallated pavements, several guest suites arranged around their own courtyards, a spacious entrance-hall and even an audience chamber; truly a residence fit for a king!
Building work on the villa was started in the early AD70's, and over the years, additional wings, mozaics and gardens were added, which eventually covered about 4 hectares (10 acres), making Fishbourne one of the largest villas in Britain. The villa was apparently destroyed by fire in the late third century during which lead from the roof of the north wing melted over the surface of the mozaics beneath. After this catastrophic event the villa was abandoned, later becoming the site for a number of late-Roman burials, after many of its carfully prepared building-stones were removed for use in other constructions in the surrounding area.
The number of Roman inscriptions on stone recovered from Chichester and its environs is relatively few - only nine at the last count - but two of these in particular are very important. The first is a building inscription dedicated to the emperor Nero, the earliest dateable Roman stone in Britain, which is described on the RBO page for Chichester ( RIB 92), the second stone is an altar to the deities Neptune and Minerva which provides confirmation of a crucial statement in one of the classical histories (vide infra).
|[N]EPTVNO ET MINERVAE
[PR]O SALVTE DO[MVS] DIVINAE
EX AVCTORITAT[E TI] CLAVD
[CO]GIDVBNI R[EX MA]GNI BRIT
[COLE]GIVM FABROR ET [Q]VI IN E[O]
[SVN]T D S D DONANTE AREAM
[...] ENTE PVDENTINI FIL
|"To Neptune and Minerva, for the welfare of the Divine House, by the authority of Tiberius Claudius Cogidubnus, Great King in Britain,¹ the college of artificers and those therein erected this temple from their own resources [...]ens, son of Pudentinus, donated the site."|
|(Burn; RIB 91; probably contemporary with RIB 92 at Chichester)|
The above inscription naming a certain Cogidubnus 'Great King in Britain', provides important confirmation for a passage from a famous work by the great Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus. In the Agricola, a biography of Tacitus' own father-in-law, a Cogidumnus is reported to have been made 'Client King' in Britain.
"The first consular governor to be placed in command of Britain was Aulus Plautius: soon after came Ostorius Scapula, both distinguished soldiers. The nearest portion of Britain was reduced little by little to the condition of a province: a colony of veterans was also planted. Certain states were handed over to king Cogidumnus - he has remained continuously loyal to our own times - according to the old and long-received principle of Roman policy, which employs kings as tools of enslavement." (Tacitus Agricola 14.1)
The question whether the Cogidumnus of Tacitus is the same person as the Cogidubnus of RIB 91 will probably never be known for certain, but I reckon it's a safe-enough bet.
Other evidence which seems to confirm the reign of Cogidubnus in Britain comes in the form of two silver coins from the south of England, a stater found at Portsmouth, and a minim found at Hod Hill. Both of these coins are fully Romanised in design, and inscribed with the formula CRAB, which has been expanded to read C[ogidubnus] R[ex] A[trebatum] B[ritanniorum], or 'Cogidumnus, King of the Atrebates of Britain'. If Cogidubnus was a client king of Rome, as is apparently evidenced, he would have been allowed to issue his own coinage. This practice is not unique to Cogidubnus in post-Celtic Britain, for king Prasutagus of the Iceni tribe from Norfolk was another client of Rome, and is known also to have produced his own coinage after the AD43 invasion.
It is quite likely that Cogidubnus was the descendant and probable heir of king Verica of the Atrebates, a king known by his coinage to be pro-Roman in attitude, who was forced to flee to the protection of Rome c.AD42 following his expulsion from Britain by the Trinovantian warlord Caratacus. It is possible that Cogidubnus accompanied his elder relative during his flight to Claudius in Rome, but it is more likely given the enormous trust he was given later on, that Cogidubnus was already known to the imperial court, having been sent to Rome as a hostage to be educated in the ways of Roman society, as was often the case with the heirs of pro-Roman or fully client states.
Mozaic from Fishbourne
Cupid riding a dolphin?
The successful campaigns of Vespasian in the south-west of England may have been expedited to some extent by the young British prince, recently returned from the continent in the train of the Roman invasion army. As a reward for his stout pro-Roman stance, the young prince was officially made client-king of Rome sometime before the death of the emperor Claudius in AD54, as evidenced by his adoptive Roman name Tiberius Claudius. This kingship very likely gave the young British prince the tribal territories of his native Atrebates, the neighbouring state of the Regni and possibly also the Belgae, he was also allowed to issue his own coinage.
Given the proximity of the inscribed Chichester stone to the villa at Fishbourne, the opulence of the villa itself, which boasted fine marble transported all the way from Greece and Italy, the testimony of the great historian Tacitus confirming his name and client-status, and also the coinage in the south of England, it is not outside the realms of possibility that the Fishbourne palace was indeed, the residence of the 'Great King of Britain', Cogidubnus of the Atrebates.